Link roundup: direct charitable giving, energy efficiency, and TSA opt-outs
“I was just trying to help“ — This American Life and Planet Money recently did an episode about a charity that gives money directly to people. Â I haven’t actually had a chance to listen yet, but am looking forward to it and will hopefully post more about it once I do.
Why bad environmentalism is such an easy sell — A recent Freakonomics episode that I did listen to. Â It was mostly useful as a reminder that evaluating environmental impact can be more difficult than you think; e.g., increasing the amount of development in cities (which are relatively energy efficient due to factors like shared transit, short distances to travel to get resources, etc.) may be better for the environment than more rural development. Â Also, if everyone switched to more fuel efficient cars, and the cost of fuel to travel a given distance goes down, that could potentially cause people to drive a lot more. Â The conversation was generally more speculative than data-driven (and Freakonomics has been sloppy about some of their claims in the past), but it made me want to dig into the work of Ed Glaeser — the Harvard economics professor interviewed here — and related work in more detail.
CHARTS: US carbon emissions are dropping: Â Historically, I’ve mostly blogged here about quantifying the effects of individual choices we make in our lives. Â But it’s great to get more systemic evidence that our individual actions can add up. Â Among the factors that have made a significant impact are household energy reduction and more fuel efficient vehicles. Â More people and businesses have been using renewable energy, too. Of course, it’s not all that clear-cut: the biggest factor is the increase in use of natural gas in place of coal — a change which is thanks mostly to fracking. Â This American Life and many others have covered some of the potential worries surrounding fracking. Â Still, it’s heartening to see some large scale good news, which reduced carbon emissions are.
Scanning the scanners — millimeter wave vs. X-ray TSA scanners: A good comparison of the types of TSA body scanners currently in use.  I’ve been meaning to post for some time about whether opting out of TSA body scans does anything to change the system.  There are personal reasons in terms of personal safety and privacy — and a lack of outside auditing — to consider opting out of scans for at least the X-ray machines (arguably there may be privacy concerns for both).  And there is evidence that the machines are not nearly as effective as one would hope, both missing actual weapons and having high rates of false alarms.
But if one of your primary objectives in opting out is registering a complaint with the government and encouraging systemic changes, is opting out at all effective? Â I suspect it probably isn’t very effective, but I don’t have any evidence yet. Â I’ll continue to look for evidence as to how effective this and other methods of TSA protest are. Â Â In the meantime, I’d love to hear from people who currently opt-out about why they do so, especially if they opt out of the millimeter wave machines.